Comparative Analysis of Biogas and Methane Yields from Different Sizes of Groundnut Shell in a Batch Reactor at Mesophilic Temperature

Main Article Content

S. O. Jekayinfa
A. O. Adebayo
O. O. Oniya
K. O. Olatunji


Aim: To study the effects of different sizes of groundnut shell on biogas and methane yields using batch reactor at mesophilic temperature.

Place and Duration of Study: The laboratory experiment was carried out at the Laboratory of the Department of Agricultural Engineering, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria, between August and October, 2018.

Methodology: Batch experiment was set up for a period of 35 days with substrate reduced to 2, 4 and 6 mm sizes. The digesters were subjected to anaerobic digestion at mesophilic condition and the gas produced were collected with graduated gas sampling bottles dipped in measuring cylinders already filled with red liquid. The total gas produced was analyzed using gas analyzer to give the percentage composition of the gas components and Enwuff equation was used to calculate the biogas and methane yields of organic dry matter and fresh mass of the samples.

Results: The total gas volume of 482.5, 605.0 and 732.5 ml were recorded for the sizes 2, 4 and 6 mm respectively. The organic dry matter biogas yields were 357.1, 514.31 and 324.5 lNkg-1oDM for treatment 2, 4 and 6 mm respectively; while organic dry matter methane produced were 222.41, 298.41 and 211.31 CH4kg-1oDM for 2, 4 and 6 mm, respectively. The fresh mass biogas yields were 147.6, 180.7 and 177.3 lNkg-1FM and fresh mass methane yield were 919, 104.8 and 115.4 lNCHkg-1FM for 2, 4 and 6 mm, respectively.

Conclusion: Considering the yields recorded, the experiment shows that size reduction had effect on biogas yields and it is an important factor to be considered in biogas production. Treatment with particle size 4 mm seems to be the ideal size when considered the yields in terms of organic dry matter and fresh mass basis.

Biogas, pretreatment, groundnut shell, size reduction, mesophilic temperature, organic dry matter, fresh mass, methane

Article Details

How to Cite
Jekayinfa, S. O., Adebayo, A. O., Oniya, O. O., & Olatunji, K. O. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Biogas and Methane Yields from Different Sizes of Groundnut Shell in a Batch Reactor at Mesophilic Temperature. Journal of Energy Research and Reviews, 5(1), 34-44.
Original Research Article


Montgomery LFR, Bochmann G. Pretreatment of feedstock for enhance biogas production. Task 37. Iea Energy Technology Network, IEA Bioenergy; 2014.

Khanal SK. Anaerobic biotechnology for bioenergy production. Published by John Wiley & Sons; 2008.

Lehtomaki A. Biogas production from energy crops and crop residues. JYVASKYLA Studies in Biological and Environmental Science. 2006;9-4.

Yusuf OA, Oluwatosin E, Ibikunle OO. Utilising renewable energy technologies for electricity and poverty reduction in South-West Nigeria: technology adoption and psychosocial perspectives Int. J. Renewable Energy Technology. 2015;6(3): 224-244.

Hanjie Z. Sludge treatment to increase biogas production. TRITA-LWR degree project 10-20. Department of Land and Water Resources Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden. 2010;1-24.

Ramatsa IM, Akinlabi ET, Huberts R. Anaerobic digestion of grass-cuttings under mesophilic and regulated digester pressure. Int. J. Renewable Energy Technology. 2018;9(1/2):28-38.

Adebayo AO, Jekayinfa SO, Linke B. Effect of co-digestion on anaerobic digestion of pig slurry with maize cob at mesophilic temperature. Journal of Natural Sciences Research 2014b;4(22):66-73.

Adebayo AO, Jekayinfa SO, Linke B. Anaerobic co-digestion of cattle slurry with maize stalk at mesophilic temperature. American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER). 2014a;3(01):80-88.

Adebayo AO, Jekayinfa SO, Linke B. Effect of co-digestion on anaerobic digestion of cattle slurry with maize cob at mesophilic temperature. Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy. 2013;3(7):47-54.

Ogunkunle O, Olatunji KO, Amos JO. Comparative analysis of co-digestion of cow dung and jatropha cake at ambient temperature. J. Fundam Renewable Energy Appl. 2018;8(5):271.
DOI: 10.4172/2090-4541.1000271

Sergio EAO, Jorge M, Gustavo P. Assessment of effects of temperature on biogas production from bovine rumen and banana (Musa acuminata) stem undergoing anaerobic codigestion. Int. J. Environmental Engineering. 2012;4(3/4): 197-209.

Bruni E. Improved anaerobic digestion of energy crops and agricultural residues. Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark; 2010.

Hendriks ATWM, Zeeman G. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology. 2009;100(1):10-18.

Beguin P, Aubert J. The biological degradation of cellulose. FEMS Microbiol, Rev. 1994;13(25):28.

Mohammad JT, Keikhosro. A critical review on analysis in pretreatment of lignocelluloses: Degree of polymerization, adsorption/desorption and accessibility. Bioresources Technology; 2008.

Sada BH, Amartey YD Bako S. An Investigation into the use of groundnut shell as fine Aggregate replacement. Nigerian Journal of Technology (NIJOTECH). 2013;32(1):54-60.

ICRISAT. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics Report; 2012.

FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization Statistics Data; 2014.
(Accessed on 25/10/2019)

Alabadan BA, Olutoye MA, Abolarin MS, Zakariya M. Partial replacement of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) with Bambara Groundnut Shell Ash (BGSA) in concrete. Leonardo Electronic Journal of Practices and Technologies. 2005;6:43-48.

VDI 4630 Enwuff. Vergarung organischer stoffe (Green paper: Fermentation of organic materials). BeuthVerlag GmbH, D – 10772, Berlin; 2004

Barton GM. Definition of biomass samples involving wood, bark and foliage. Biomass. 1984;4:311–314.

Linke B, Schelle H. Solid state anaerobic digestion of organic wastes. Agricultural engineering into the third millenium. AgEng Warwick. Paper Number 00-AP-025. 2000;101-102:2-7.

McDonald P, Henderson N, Heron S. The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed. Chalcombe Publications, Marlow UK; 1991.

Wang J, Yue ZB, Chen TH, Peng SC, Yu HQ, Chen HZ. Anaerobic digestibility and fiber composition of bulrush in response to steam explosion. Bioresource Technology. 2010;101(17):6610-6614.

Karki AB, Dixit K. Biogas Field Book. Sahayogi Press, Kathamandu. Nepal; 1984.

Gnanambal VS, Swaminathan K. Biogas production from renewable lignocellulosic biomass. Int. J. of Environment. 2015;4(2): 341-347.

Mshandete AM, Björnsson L, Kivaisi AK, Rubindamayugi MST, Mattiasson B. Effect of particle size on biogas yield from Sisal fibre waste; 2006.
(Accessed on 29 November, 2018)

Kouichi I, Tatsuki T. Effects of particle size on anaerobic digestion of food waste. International Biodeterioration and Degradation. 2010;64(7).

Prajapati KK, Pareek N, Vivekanand V. Pretreatment and multi-feed anaerobic co-digestion of agro-industrial residual biomass for improved biomethanation and kinetic analysis. Front. Energy Res. 2018; 6:111.

Zhang RH, Zhang ZQ. Biogasification of Rice straw with an anaerobic-phased solids digester system. Bioresource Technology. 1999;68(3):235-245.

Schell D, Harwood C. Milling of lignocellulosic biomass. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 1994;45–46:159–168.

Sinitsyn AP, Gusakov AV, Vlasenko EY. Effect of structural and physic-chemical features of cellulosic substrates on the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 1991;30 (1):43–59.

Moniruzzaman M, Dale BE, Hespell RB, Bothast RJ. Enzymatic hydrolysis of high-moisture corn fiber pretreated by afex and recovery and recycling of the enzyme complex. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 1997;67(1-2):113–126.

Menardo S, Airoldi G, Balsari P. The Effect of particle size and thermal pre-treatment on the methane yield of four agricultural by-products. Bioresource Technology. 2012;104:708–714.

Annuputtikul W, Rodtong S. Laboratory scale experiments for biogas production from cassava tubers. The Joint International Conference on “Sustainable Energy and Environment (SEE)”, HuaHinm, Thailand; 2004.